[2024-feb-29] Sad news: Eric Layton aka Nocturnal Slacker aka vtel57 passed away on Feb 26th, shortly after hospitalization. He was one of our Wiki's most prominent admins. He will be missed.
Diferencias
Muestra las diferencias entre dos versiones de la página.
Ambos lados, revisión anteriorRevisión previaPróxima revisión | Revisión previa | ||
es:slackbook:intro_to_slackware [2019/01/29 21:26 (UTC)] – [Differences Compared to Other Linux Distributions] slackwarespanol | es:slackbook:intro_to_slackware [2019/02/26 00:22 (UTC)] (actual) – [Permisos de uso] pedro.herrero | ||
---|---|---|---|
Línea 5: | Línea 5: | ||
===== ¿Por qué usar Slackware? ===== | ===== ¿Por qué usar Slackware? ===== | ||
- | Slackware tiene una larga tradición de excelencia. Comenzó en 1992 y | + | Slackware tiene una larga tradición de excelencia. Comenzó en 1992 y fue liberado en 1993, Slackware es la distribución |
- | liberado en 1993, Slackware es la distribución Linux más antigua en mantenimiento. El enfoque de Slackware es en hacer un Linux limpio y simple.Una distribución lo más parecida posible a UNIX lo convierte en una opción natural para aquellas personas que realmente quieren aprender sobre Linux y otros Sistemas | + | |
Línea 16: | Línea 15: | ||
===== Diferencias en comparación con otras distribuciones de Linux ===== | ===== Diferencias en comparación con otras distribuciones de Linux ===== | ||
- | There are a great number of differences between | + | Existe una gran cantidad de diferencias entre Slackware |
- | mainstream distributions such as Red Hat, Debian, and Ubuntu. Quizás la mayor diferencia es la falta de // " | + | |
- | with custom graphical configuration tools for all manner of services. In | + | |
- | many cases, these configuration tools are the preferred method of setting | + | |
- | up applications on these systems and will overwrite any changes you make | + | |
- | to the configuration files via other means. These tools often make it easy | + | |
- | (or at least possible) for a rookie with no in-depth understanding of | + | |
- | his system to setup basic services; however, they also make it difficult | + | |
- | to do anything too out of the ordinary. In contrast, Slackware | + | |
- | you, the system administrator, to do these tasks on your own. | + | |
- | Slackware | + | |
- | with the source code published by upstream developers. This means there | + | |
- | is often a somewhat steeper learning curve associated with Slackware, | + | |
- | for those users familiar with other Linux distributions, but also makes it | + | |
- | much easier to do whatever you want with your operating system. | + | |
+ | Además, es posible que escuche a los usuarios de otras distribuciones decir que Slackware | ||
- | Also, you may hear users of other distributions say that Slackware has | + | ===== Permisos de uso ===== |
- | no package management system. | + | |
- | Slackware has always had package management (see [[slackbook: | + | |
- | automatic dependency resolution - Slackware' | + | |
- | dependency management for simplicity, ease-of-use, | + | |
- | ===== Licensing ===== | + | Cada pieza de Slackware (esto es así para todas las distribuciones de Linux) está desarrollada por diferentes personas (o equipos de personas), y cada grupo tiene sus propias ideas sobre lo que significa ser //" |
- | Each piece of Slackware (this is true of all Linux distributions) is | + | Probablemente la licencia más popular en uso dentro de la comunidad de Software Libre es la Licencia Pública General de GNU. La GPL fue creada por [[http:// |
- | developed by different people (or teams of people), and each group has | + | |
- | their own ideas about what it means to be //"free"// | + | |
- | there are literally dozens and dozens of different licenses granting | + | |
- | you different permissions regarding their use or distribution. | + | |
- | Fortunately dealing with free software | + | |
- | it may first appear. Most things are licensed with either the Gnu | + | |
- | General Public License or the BSD license. Sometimes you'll encounter a | + | |
- | piece of software | + | |
- | they are remarkably similar to either the GPL or the BSD license. | + | |
+ | Otra licencia muy común es la licencia BSD, que posiblemente sea //" | ||
- | Probably the most popular license in use within the Free Software | ||
- | community is the GNU General Public License. | ||
- | the [[ http:// | ||
- | which actively works to create and distribute software that guarantees | ||
- | the freedoms which they believe are basic rights. | ||
- | the very group that coined the term //" | ||
- | no restrictions on the use of software. | ||
- | to accept the terms of the license in order to use the software, but | ||
- | you are not allowed to redistribute the software or any changes to it | ||
- | without abiding by the terms of the license agreement. | ||
- | of software projects shipped with Slackware, from the Linux kernel | ||
- | itself to the Samba project, are released under the terms of the GPL. | ||
- | + | ====== | |
- | Another very common license is the BSD license, which is arguably //" | + | **Próximo |
- | free"// | + | |
- | derivative works. | + | ====== |
- | remain intact along with a simple disclaimer. | + | |
- | specific to Slackware are licensed with a BSD-style license, and this | + | |
- | is the preferred license for many smaller projects and tools. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | ====== | + | |
- | **Próximo | + | |
- | + | ||
- | ====== | + | |
<!-- If you copy information from another source, then specify that source --> | <!-- If you copy information from another source, then specify that source --> | ||
- | * Original | + | * Fuente |
<!-- Authors are allowed to give credit to themselves! --> | <!-- Authors are allowed to give credit to themselves! --> | ||
- | * Originally written by Alan Hicks, Chris Lumens, David Cantrell, Logan Johnson | + | * Escrito originalmente por Alan Hicks, Chris Lumens, David Cantrell, Logan Johnson |
+ | * Traducido por: [[wiki: | ||
<!-- * Contrbutions by [[wiki: | <!-- * Contrbutions by [[wiki: | ||